Re: Dynamic 2D Allocation

From: QMar=EDa_J._Mart=EDn=22?= (maria.martin.santamaria_at_udc.es)
Date: Wed Dec 02 2009 - 06:09:40 PST

  • Next message: Oliver Perks: "Re: Dynamic 2D Allocation"
    The a pointer  is incorrectly declarated.
    
    Try:
    
    shared[] int *shared * a;
    
    a = (shared[] int *shared *)upc_all_alloc(10,sizeof(shared int*));
    
    Regards,
    
    Mar�a
    
    
    
    El 02/12/2009, a las 11:25, Oliver Perks escribi�:
    
    > I have been trying to get a simple example working where by a 2D  
    > array is striped across multiple processors. Where each column is  
    > placed on a different processor in a round robin fashion.
    > I assumed that this would be achieved by the code provided by Ben,  
    > but the results suggest otherwise. Can anyone shine some light on  
    > what I would have considered a rather simple problem.
    >
    >
    > shared int *shared * a;
    >
    > a = (shared int *shared *)upc_all_alloc(10,sizeof(shared int*));
    > upc_forall(int i = 0; i < 10; i++; i)
    > {
    >   a[i] = upc_alloc(10*sizeof(shared int));
    >   for(int j = 0; j < 10; j++)
    >   {
    >      a[i][j] = i * j;
    >      printf("Owner of %d - %d is %d\n", i, j, upc_threadof(&a[i][j]));
    >   }
    > }
    > return 0;
    >
    >
    > When run on 2 threads:
    > I would expect this to put even columns on thread 0, and odd columns  
    > on thread 1. Then each column be entirely constrained within that  
    > thread.
    >
    > 0   1   0   1   0   1   .....
    > 0   1   0   1   0   1   .....
    > 0   1   0   1   0   1   .....
    > 0   1   0   1   0   1   .....
    > 0   1   0   1   0   1   .....
    > .     .   .   .   .   .   .
    >
    > By what I actually get is that it is striping the column over the  
    > processors.
    >
    > 0   1   0   1   0   1   .....
    > 1    0   1   0   1   0    .....
    > 0   1   0   1   0   1   .....
    > 1    0   1   0   1   0    .....
    > 0   1   0   1   0   1   .....
    > .     .   .   .   .   .   .
    >
    > Any ideas.
    > Regards Oliver
    >
    >
    >
    >
    

  • Next message: Oliver Perks: "Re: Dynamic 2D Allocation"