Re: Atomic set for double

From: Nikita Andreev (lestat_at_kemsu.ru)
Date: Thu Feb 11 2010 - 19:38:24 PST

  • Next message: Paul H. Hargrove: "Re: Atomic set for double"
    Dorian,
    
    > a) There is no user control over the "affinity" of a lock, right? It
    > seems to me that e.g. in your Berkeley implementation, all locks are
    > managed on thread 0. It appears to me that "localized locks" with
    > affinity to some thread would be nice to have in the standard ...
    
    Paul, correct if I'm wrong but in UPC you can use upc_global_lock_alloc. It 
    returns a pointer to the lock object in the calling thread. The pointer 
    itself can be declared in the thread's private space.
    
    Nikita 
    

  • Next message: Paul H. Hargrove: "Re: Atomic set for double"